New York, New York
Even on the days when living in New York got me down, I always felt it would be a fantastic place to visit. Turns out I was right. Best of all was the time spent with loved ones: my brother and his girlfriend, Mr. Garter’s godmother and her husband, my pals at The Point, and of course my dearest Spiders. (Psst…check out Steph’s gallery for pictures of me holding Little Miss Adorable herself, baby MJ! And Lisa has a picture of MJ sporting the little ribbed jacket I made for her.) I even got to watch the World Cup in Spanish, thanks to Steph’s mad DVR skills. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!
And ultimately, New York came through for me on everything but the weather. That’s right, I bought yarn and jeans! Steph, Lisa and I took a little field trip to School Products, where I snagged a couple of lovely gunmetal grey skeins of Italian laceweight merino. Never mind that I already have two of these little babies in a stormy blue still waiting to become an Ene’s Shawl for my mother. I also couldn’t resist the ridiculous 50% sale The Point was having on Jaeger Siena cotton, so I grabbed five balls of a very springy green. It should be enough for a tank, so who’s got suggestions for me? What are your favorite summer top patterns that might work for a yarn that knits up at 28 x 38 on US 2-3’s? I’m thinking I’d like a camisole with a lace element. I really love the one Becky made, but I don’t have an easy way to get my hands on the Phildar pattern.
And the jeans, did I mention the jeans? The stars were finally aligned for jeans shopping on Thursday, and I made out like a bandit at the Macy’s sale. I collected so many promising pairs to take to the dressing room that I thought I’d better take notes. You see, I’m terribly picky about the way jeans fit. If you’re like my mother, who steadfastly adheres to the L.L. Bean model with the high waist, full seat, and tapered legs, jeans shopping is never a problem. But I’m still a relatively svelte young thing, so I figure I might as well enjoy sexier jeans while I can. And a good pair is much harder to find. The current fashion for long pants generally suits my leggy 5’11” frame, but if they’re four inches too long on me, who exactly are they supposed to fit? And can we talk about low rise for a minute? I’m totally happy to see waist lines move south of the belly button, but the general public does not need to see my hip bones, nor the foothills of my gluteus maximi. I like to perform the squat test to see what I’ll be baring should I need to bend over or sit in the course of the day. Affiliated with many low rise jeans is a troubling phenomenon I like to call the Stand-Up Comedy effect, in which the waist band doesn’t curve back in with the body after the hips, but projects laughably straight up from the fullest point of the pants. Exactly what shape would I have to be to fill such trousers, particularly above the buttocks? No belt in the world is going to cinch all that in comfortably. Finally, there’s the issue of the jodhpur region. You know, that area on the upper outside of the thigh that’s a little troublesome for those of us who don’t have model spaghetti legs? Many pairs of jeans actually accent any bulginess there, and that is no good thing. A little extra compression in the jodhpur vicinity is a little more flattering to most of us. So here’s what I found:
Wranglers: unkind jodhpurs, and too long, producing a strange baggy knee effect.
Earl Jeans: (My most fashionable cousin, Rachel, looks great in Earl Jeans. She claims they lift and separate.) But these are too flared at the cuff, too much compression in the behind, and too distressed. (Did I mention how stupid I think it is to pay money for something that’s already been artfully shredded? I can wear my pants out just fine by myself, thanks.) Very poor performance on the squat test.
A.B.S. Jeans: decent all around, good waist. Slight damage to one knee; only $15!
Buffalo: (Oh great, I thought. Just what a woman wants to feel like when she pulls on her pants in the morning.) But sexy! Nice contours in the back, and now I see what Rachel means about the lifting and separation. Perfect length. Try to remember that 29″ x 33.5″ is the perfect size on future shopping trips.
City of Angels: good overall, but a little more distressed than I’d like.
Mavi (2): (My previous jeans were Mavis, so I had high hopes.) But these displayed poor gluteal shaping, with stand-up comedy. One pair was extremely low rise – no muffin top effect for this girl, thank you very much.
Indie: comfy stretch, appealingly dark color. But wide pockets spoil the rear view, too low rise, worst in squat test. Next!
Born in California: (My northwest prejudices make me disinclined to like them already.) Good length, but fail the squat test. And only middling in the lifting and separation departments.
The final choices? Buffalo wins – they’re more expensive than I’d like, but for 20% off I can stomach the price. Especially when I threw in the A.B.S. for good measure. If I buy two pairs, I won’t have to do this again for a long time! And when I average the prices, I’m only paying $35 for each pair, and that’s within the limits of what I’m willing to spend. Woot!
Now I’m back in Portland, being thoroughly perforated and drool-bespeckled by my happy cat. Fingers crossed for the job interview I had this morning, okay everybody? This afternoon I have to meet the appraiser and let him into My Soon-to-Be House so he can do whatever it is appraisers do. Yes, we’re buying the house! When Mr. Garter gets back from New York next weekend with the camera, I’ll show you some pictures of it. I think you’ll agree it’s absurdly cute.
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 1:25 pm
It was so wonderful to have you here, Sarah. I miss you terribly already. And thanks for the report on the jeans, written in your lovely, inimitable style.
And I can whole-heartedly vouch for the adorable-ness of Sarah’s soon-to-be house!
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 1:56 pm
I just don’t think there is anything that compares to buying or at least trying to buy jeans. It is a horrible time in shopping! I went jean shopping once with my husband premarriage. He married me so he must be a good guy! He won’t do it again, however, and we’ve been married almost 16 years! Excited to hear about your house!
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 2:20 pm
It’s good to see your trip to NY went well!
Congrats on the new house! Good luck on the job!
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 3:42 pm
oooo, thanks for the jeans write up! i’ll have to keep buffalo and ABS in mind for future shopping at macys. i always have problems jeans shopping as well and you have all of my criteria down pat 🙂
it was so great seeing you! miss you already!
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 5:28 pm
Your jeans write-up is hilarious. Unfortunately, I feel like we each have to try on many pairs of jeans to figure out what fits our particular body type. *sigh*
Perhaps this will cheer us up: your Bergere de France yarn has been officially handed over! It’s now in Mr. Garter’s hands. Mrs. Hirsch took a peek and liked it, so I hope you will too!
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 5:46 pm
ahhh, Veronique, that was you who dropped the yarn off. Don’t worry, I’ll wrap it in plastic and put it in a different compartment in my bag than my running shoes. 😉
Mrs. Garter, I’m so proud that you used the term ‘w00t!’ There is a D&D gamer in you yet!! Awesome.
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 6:01 pm
Hey Sarah, it was so nice to meet you on Friday! Awesome jeans write-up, I am in need of a new pair, and am completely dreading the trip to Macy’s. All I can ever see in the mirror is that “jodhpur” region.
I think this will give you my email for your lovely baby sweater pattern. I am so excited to knit it for my friend the new mommy–thank you!
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 9:00 pm
You know what? In the latest Lang pattern book there is a camisole that is very, very similar to the one I knit. And there’s an English version available!
Posted: June 13th, 2006 at 9:43 pm
thanks for the jean-shopping notes! i am so hopelessly short that i can only buy “short” jeans. (i refuse to hem jeans — why can’t they call them petite?) i’ve only had luck with american rag as of late, but maybe i’ll give one of these brands a try.
Posted: June 14th, 2006 at 6:23 am
What an awesome jeans analysis! I hate to shop for clothes, simply because I can never find jeans that fit/camoflauge/obscure/etc. all of my figure flaws. The squat test should be taught in school — maybe then this tide of insanely-low low riders will be stemmed.
Posted: June 14th, 2006 at 7:24 am
Your jeans analysis is hysterical! I am much too intimately aquainted with trying to find jeans that don’t accentuate my already accentuated “jodhpur region.” Yeesh. Lucky you for finding ones that fit! (Though I think I might be renaming those Buffalo’s… don’t know if I’d want to be thinking about wearing my hot little top with my Buffalo’s for a Sat. night! Maybe Buffalettes or something a wee bit more diminutive, lol!)
Posted: June 14th, 2006 at 11:33 am
It was so great seeing you on Friday! I Love your jeans write up, I too am super picky with jeans and I can’t stand lowrise…it’s almost impossible to find a decen’t pair of pants with a normal waist.